Rajkot Drama

825 runs scored in under 8 hours. 15 wickets given scoring them.
One team lost by 3 runs.

A remarkable match. Because in the end it was not the 414 that India scored that won them the match. A huge score by any reckoning. Yet, one cannot say that it was the scoring of 400 that led us to win.

Nor was it the 411 that SL scored chasing. Under any circumstances one would have thought that a team scoring 400 would have won. Well, they didn't.

India won because it held its collective nerve in the last two overs. So it didn't really matter to all of us who were watching if the score was 400 or 200. The important thing in the 50th over was was that Ashish Nehra should not give a 4 and should preferably take a wicket every ball. I did not think of 414. And I bet you didn't either. It was all about Nehra bowling those yorkers and SL not being able to score of the last 6 balls. The actual score was inconsequential; it could have been anything!

However the match will always be remembered, not for its close verdict, but for the two teams that scored 400 apiece. In a way it is fair - after all, we have seen so many close matches with all kinds of scores. But nail-biters with 400 runs apiece? well, just 2! This and the one that SA and Oz played in 2006.

The cynic would say that there now is no need for the bowler. They anyway get carted for boundaries. They might as well have bowling machines instead. Yet while watching this match, it is impossible to imagine India winning had Zaheer and Ashish N. not bowled those yorkers in the last two overs.

However, the credit, 100% credit, to make this match a nail-biter goes to the SL team. As Sanga said, they did not, 'roll over and die' (haha, Oh! the wit of a budding lawyer) thinking of chasing 414. They matched India blow for blow and held a slight advantage at the 35 over mark.

Which is why I would have given my MoM to the 160 by Dilshan. Maybe the adjudicators could have been cheesy and given it jointly to Viru and Dilshan? This SL team is a proud team and Sanga is the most gracious of leaders. Perhaps is is better to not rub in the salt and give this the flavour of a 'consolation' by going joint or giving it to Dilshan. You know what? I think, it's fine that SL walk away with the head held high and without people throwing scraps at them.

It is amusing to see Mahi do the deliberate nonchalant act after we win. He does this after every match of consequence. It looks cool. Suits Mahi.

One last thing. I don't want to make a big deal out of this. But I can't help mentioning that the last two Test matches and this ODI were far more riveting and satisfying than the two 2020s. I'm just saying...thats all.

:-)

Well, in the end we won. Good for us.

Match schedule in Champions Trophy

Before India plays her first game, SA, SL and WI would have finished 2 of their 3 matches. India play Pakistan, for whom it will be the second match. Intriguingly, Pakistan then have to wait till the 30th for the last match with Australia; same as WI who will play us on the same day.

I wonder, why this lopsidedness?

Has it something to do with an early Indian departure? It's known that with the exit of the Indian team, the TV spectators too drop drastically. Some companies now release the new adverts only when assured of an Indian presence in the 'second week'. I cannot recall this kind of 'adjustments' being made in the itinerary for past world cups and major tournaments.

While it makes sense to ensure that everyone profits from cricket, it will be wise for the administrators to keep the interest of the game itself as the highest priority. For example, if a schedule is designed where a team goes off the boil (as Pak or WI might), it is not fair to them.

I'm not suggesting that the current schedule is inimical, but if the administrators are not vigilant, it will drift into that territory without them realising it.

'World Class Indian Cricketer'

Saw something hilarious today. Being a holiday, I'd gone to Nirmal Lifestyles, a mall in Mulund to pick a few bargains for the home. On my way out, my attention was drawn to this ugly stump-of-a-commemorative pillar with the following legend...

Good that we have been told about this Rahul Dravid. The one that I knew is really a banker who sells Amway on weekends. lolz

IPL

I have to write about IPL - cannot help it.
All the drama before a ball was bowled - that sapped some of my interest, instead of whetting it. To be honest, I did not think Modi san would carry it off - he did! Wow! As a pure management exercise, his was sublime. If CEOs can do what he did, the recession should be short work.
Heh!

Now that it is on, I watch it when I can. The few matches that have been close - especially the three in the last 5 days, were riveting stuff. Now that I have experienced it, I also know that last year was different. Last year had energy, it had raw passion. Yes, it had more than its share of silliness, yet the people in the stands made a palpable difference. The screen used to throb. You know exactly what I'm talking about.

This year, we have had even more silliness, even more blatant commercial crassness, the commentary has been pathetic and the crowds have been dull. I don't mind the silliness or the crassness or the commentary because I can do mute, or simply flick to Natgeo and come back exactly to rejoin the play. But the energy? It is missing. The crowds are thin, there is bonhomie maybe, but no partisanship, no heart-thumping electricity. Its boring.

I might as well be watching Essex bat against Notts - don't really give a rat's ass. Clearly, IPL can only work in India. That is a learning that Lalit Modi must have got by now. Knowing him, we can be sure that the next year it will be in India, come het or wet, rain or snow; and we also know that the brazen strategy break will be gone as well. Thank the Lord for small mercies!!